Logo Logo

Schroers, Maike; Walter, Beate; Fischer, Stine; Cremer, Jessica; Bauer, Eva‐Maria; Zablotzki, Yury; Majzoub‐Altweck, Monir; Meyer‐Lindenberg, Andrea (2024): Studies on the association of malondialdehyde as a biomarker for oxidative stress and degree of malignancy in dogs with mammary adenocarcinomas. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10 (4). ISSN 2053-1095

[thumbnail of Veterinary_Medicine___Sci_-_2024_-_Schroers_-_Studies_on_the_association_of_malondialdehyde_as_a_biomarker_for_oxidative.pdf] Veröffentlichte Publikation
Veterinary_Medicine___Sci_-_2024_-_Schroers_-_Studies_on_the_association_of_malondialdehyde_as_a_biomarker_for_oxidative.pdf

Die Publikation ist unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-Kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung (CC BY-NC-ND) verfügbar.

Herunterladen (1MB)

Abstract

Background
Mammary adenocarcinomas are one of the most common tumour diseases in bitches. The relationship between oxidative stress and the degree of malignancy of the tumour has not been sufficiently researched in veterinary medicine.

Objectives
The main objective was to investigate the potential role of MDA as a practice-relevant biomarker for the assessment of systemic oxidative stress and to determine whether this parameter can indicate the malignancy grade of a mammary adenocarcinoma.

Methods
In the present pilot study, MDA plasma concentrations were analysed in 55 bitches with (n = 28) and without (n027) malignant adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland using two different measurement methods and the relationship to tumour size was investigated.

Results
The mean MDA concentration measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was 289 ng/mL (range 365–634 ng/mL) in dogs with grade 1 adenocarcinoma (n = 13), 288.5 ng/mL (range 85–752 ng/mL) in dogs with grade 2 adenocarcinoma (n = 10), 332 ng/mL (range 239–947 ng/mL) in dogs with grade 3 (n = 5) adenocarcinoma and 293 ng/mL (range 175–549 ng/mL) in dogs without a mammary tumour (n = 27). When MDA was measured by HPLC, the average MDA concentration in the study group (n = 11) was 0.24 µmol/L (range 0.16–0.37) and that of the control group (n = 15) was 0.27 µmol/L (range 0.16–1.62). Thus, there were no significant differences between the study group with malignant adenocarcinomas and the control group in both examination methods (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no correlation between the MDA concentrations and the approximate volume of the mammary tumour.

Conclusion
The results highlight the challenges of providing a prognosis for the malignancy of a mammary adenocarcinoma based on MDA concentrations in plasma using ELISA or HPLC. As a result, histopathological examination remains the gold standard for diagnosing and differentiating adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland.

Publikation bearbeiten
Publikation bearbeiten