Logo Logo

Epstein, Nurith; Eberle, Julia; Meuleners, Julia S.; Lachmann, Daniel; Heuser, Sonja; Herzig, Stefan; Neuhaus, Birgit J.; Fischer, Martin R. (2023): The role of research competence as an influencing factor for the careers of young academics. Findings and implications from studies on doctorates in medicine and life sciences in Germany. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 40 (6): 70. ISSN 2366-5017

[thumbnail of zma001652.pdf] Veröffentlichte Publikation
zma001652.pdf

Die Publikation ist unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung (CC BY) verfügbar.

Herunterladen (261kB)

Abstract

Background: When viewed internationally, Germany boasts a high rate of doctoral candidates. Fields such as medicine and life sciences have a notably high proportion of doctoral students, a trend rooted in historical factors. Despite this, comprehensive empirical studies concerning the doctoral phase and early-career researchers, especially in relation to the rise of structured doctoral programmes, have only recently gained traction.

Methods: We present findings from a project investigating young scientists in medicine and life sciences. Postdoctoral graduates from these disciplines were examined both quantitatively and qualitatively within the E-Prom projects, emphasizing the primary domain of research.

Results: Our analysis indicates some benefits of structured doctoral programmes over traditional individual doctorates. However, the disparities between these doctoral approaches are less pronounced than anticipated. We also identified discrepancies between the programme descriptions and their actual execution. Integration into the scientific community and research-related self-efficacy are potential indicators of publication output and inclination towards a scientific career. Physicians exhibited lower research-related self-efficacy and a lesser tendency towards a scientific career than biologists. Notably, we found gender disparities disadvantaging female graduates, with these disparities being more marked in medicine.

Conclusions: There is evidence to suggest that official representations of structured doctoral programmes do not always align with their practical applications, limiting their potential effectiveness. Therefore, resources should be allocated to ensure the consistent execution of these programmes. Given the empirical evidence supporting the benefits of community integration for junior researchers, efforts should be made to facilitate their networking. Additionally, our findings emphasize the necessity of providing enhanced support for young female scientists.

Keywords: academic research careers, structured doctoral programs, junior researchers, female researchers

Publikation bearbeiten
Publikation bearbeiten