Logo Logo

Gisi, Miriam; Ferrari, Vanessa; Dubon, Felix; Fischer, Martin R.; Angstwurm, Matthias; Berndt, Markus (2023): Objective and subjective consequences of pandemic-related study program changes for the perception of the practical year – a comparison of medical students in Germany with and without a second national board examination. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 40 (4): Doc53. pp. 1-17. ISSN 2366-5017

[thumbnail of Gisi_et_al_(2023)_Objective and subjective consequences of pandemic-related study program changes for the practical year.pdf] Published Article
Gisi_et_al_(2023)_Objective and subjective consequences of pandemic-related study program changes for the practical year.pdf

The publication is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background: Due to SARS-CoV-2, the Bavarian Ministry of Health decided in April 2020 to postpone the second national board examination in human medicine and to bring forward the start of the practical year (in German: Praktisches Jahr, further abbreviated with PJ) from May to April 2020. The different tertial times made it necessary for affected students to reorganise the PJ and rendered the preparation for the national board examination that had already taken place obsolete. As a result, students had to prepare for it again after the PJ and take it together with the third national board examination.
Research question: How do students affected by the early PJ differ in their perception of the practical year and in their psychological well- being from the comparison groups with a regular PJ schedule? Methodology: The study is based on quantitative data from the Dean of Studies Office of the Medical Faculty of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) and an online survey. The sample consists of LMU students who started the early PJ in April 2020 (n=86) and two comparison groups: The cohort of LMU students who started their PJ regularly in May 2019 (n=50), and students from other German universities who started their PJ regularly in May 2020 (n=98) and took the second national board examination in human medicine in spring 2020.
Results: For students affected by the early PJ, there were measurable negative effects on the choice of training institutions, the quality of the PJ content, preparation for the national board examinations, and career planning. Compared to regular students from other federal states, affected students reported higher psychological stress, with comparable resilience.
Conclusion: It can be assumed that the insights gained apply to the entirety of medical students in the affected federal states of Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg. As a conclusion, we make the recommendation to include the position of the students in decisions of great consequence.

View Item
View Item