Logo Logo

Schouten, Esther S.; Beyer, Maria F.; Flemmer, Andreas W.; Vos, Mirjam A. de; Kuehlmeyer, Katja (2022): Conversations About End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology: Do Doctors and Parents Implement Shared Decision-Making? Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10. ISSN 2296-2360

[thumbnail of fped-10-897014.pdf] Published Article
fped-10-897014.pdf

The publication is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (238kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in perinatal medicine have contributed to significantly improved survival of newborns. While some infants die despite extensive medical treatment, a larger proportion dies following medical decision-making (MDM). International guidelines about end-of-life (EOL) MDM for neonates unify in their recommendation for shared decision-making (SDM) between doctors and parents. Yet, we do not know to what extent SDM is realized in neonatal practice.

Objective: We aim at examining to which extent SDM is implemented in the NICU setting.

Methods: By means of Qualitative Content Analysis, audio-recorded conversations between neonatologists and parents were analyzed. We used a framework by de Vos that was used to analyze similar conversations on the PICU.

Results: In total we analyzed 17 conversations with 23 parents of 12 NICU patients. SDM was adopted only to a small extent in neonatal EOL-MDM conversations. The extent of sharing decreased considerably over the stages of SDM. The neonatologists suggested finding a decision together with parents, while at the same time seeking parents' agreement for the intended decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment.

Conclusions: Since SDM was only realized to a small extent in the NICU under study, we propose evaluating how parents in this unit experience the EOL-MDM process and whether they feel their involvement in the process acceptable and beneficial. If parents evaluate their involvement in the current approach beneficial, the need for implementation of SDM to the full extent, as suggested in the guidelines, may need to be critically re-assessed.

View Item
View Item