Burkhard-Meier, Anton; Rechenauer, Vera Valerie; Jurinovic, Vindi; Albertsmeier, Markus; Hoberger, Michael; Dürr, Hans Roland; Klein, Alexander; Knösel, Thomas; Kunz, Wolfgang G.; Mock, Andreas; Pusztai, Ada; Völkl, Michael; von Bergwelt-Baildon, Michael; Lindner, Lars H.; Di Gioia, Dorit; Berclaz, Luc M. (2025): First-line pazopanib in patients with metastatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective single-center analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 151: 150. ISSN 1432-1335
Published Article
s00432-025-06208-8.pdf
Abstract
Purpose
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.
Methods
Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.
Results
At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.
Conclusion
This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.
| Doc-Type: | Article (LMU Hospital) |
|---|---|
| Organisational unit (Faculties): | 07 Medicine > Medical Center of the University of Munich > Medical Clinic and Outpatient Clinic III (Oncology) |
| DFG subject classification of scientific disciplines: | Life sciences |
| Date Deposited: | 15. Oct 2025 12:58 |
| Last Modified: | 15. Oct 2025 12:58 |
| URI: | https://oa-fund.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/2117 |
| DFG: | Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - 491502892 |
