Logo Logo

Mansour, Nabeel; Heinrich, Kathrin; Zhang, Danmei; Winkelmann, Michael; Ingenerf, Maria; Gold, Lukas; Klambauer, Konstantin; Rudelius, Martina; Klauschen, Frederick; Bergwelt-Baildon, Michael von; Ricke, Jens; Heinemann, Volker; Westphalen, C. Benedikt; Kunz, Wolfgang G. (2024): Patient eligibility for trials with imaging response assessment at the time of molecular tumor board presentation. Cancer Imaging, 24 (1). ISSN 1470-7330

[thumbnail of s40644-024-00708-5.pdf] Published Article
s40644-024-00708-5.pdf

The publication is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (4MB)

Abstract

Purpose
To assess the eligibility of patients with advanced or recurrent solid malignancies presented to a molecular tumor board (MTB) at a large precision oncology center for inclusion in trials with the endpoints objective response rate (ORR) or duration of response (DOR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1).

Methods
Prospective patients with available imaging at the time of presentation in the MTB were included. Imaging data was reviewed for objectifiable measurable disease (MD) according to RECIST v1.1. Additionally, we evaluated the patients with MD for representativeness of the identified measurable lesion(s) in relation to the overall tumor burden.

Results
262 patients with different solid malignancies were included. 177 patients (68%) had MD and 85 (32%) had non-measurable disease (NMD) at the time point of MTB presentation in accordance with RECIST v1.1. MD was not representative of the overall tumor burden in eleven patients (6%). The main reasons for NMD were lesions with longest diameter shorter than 10 mm (22%) and non-measurable peritoneal carcinomatosis (18%). Colorectal cancer and malignant melanoma displayed the highest rates of MD (> 75%). In contrast, gastric cancer, head and neck malignancies, and ovarian carcinoma had the lowest rates of MD (< 55%). In case of MD, the measurable lesions were representative of the overall tumor burden in the vast majority of cases (94%).

Conclusion
Approximately one third of cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies are not eligible for treatment response assessment in trials with endpoints ORR or DOR at the time of MTB presentation. The rate of patients eligible for trials with imaging endpoints differs significantly based on the underlying malignancy and should be taken under consideration during the planning of new precision oncology trials.

View Item
View Item